![]() |
.
On December 1st, 1999 (two days before NASA´s 2nd of two 1999 Mars mission failures), Rich asked President George W. Bush here in Washington D.C. if he shared his father´s dreams of getting humans to Mars. Here´s the live footage of the question, and President-elect Bush´s enjoyable initial reaction...
*Special thanks go to the Republican Jewish Coalition for admirably
letting Rich ask that universally important question despite Rich´s
not even being Jewish. Also, thanks to the
Mars Society for calling this
opportunity to Rich´s attention in a sufficiently timely manner.
| Quicktime | Real Media | Windows Media Player |
| DOWNLOAD SPEED:
|
DOWNLOAD
SPEED: |
DOWNLOAD
SPEED: |
| DOWNLOAD SPEED:
|
DOWNLOAD
SPEED: |
|
| DOWNLOAD SPEED:
|
||
Quicktime is freely available |
Real Media is freely available |
free. With a plug-in, it can even be used with NetScape too. Meanwhile, free technical support is available here, and one can also try calling Microsoft at numbers listed there (including perhaps 800-936-4900). |
Having trouble viewing a |
*Again, special thanks go to the Republican Jewish Coalition for admirably letting Rich ask that universally important question despite how Rich is not even Jewish.
Anyhow, when the event concluded, President
Bush and Rich had a great one-on-one, occasionally humorous chat for nearly
five minutes. Among other comments, the president said he
does share his father´s enthusiasm
for the human exploration (and potential colonization) of Mars. He
was very convincing when saying this, in fact. However, he would need
to know more regarding how much going there would cost before he could speak
publicly in favor of such projects. (Editor´s note: His
father´s prestige did not benefit from his own
aggressive endorsement of a humans-to-Mars program.).
Rich then quoted him NASA´s latest price
for a crewed Mars mission (approximately $50 billion). The president
paused, and then said that Mars exploration seems like a project that
corporations might be best suited to accomplish (instead of bureaucratic
governmental entities).
Tax incentives struck
him as a fiscally prudent means of empowering corporations to accomplish
our goals regarding the Red Planet. The "guaranteed loans" option
did not prompt nearly as enthusiastic a reaction, however. Meanwhile,
the pro-entrepreneurial "Mars
Prize" (cash award) possibility
was not discussed, unfortunately. Neither were some other
cost-reducing, pro-entrepreneurial space program
reform proposals that
are still not getting much attention.
As the subsequent discussion was
not broadcast on national television so Space.com, SpaceViews.com and other
news services only knew to report on his initial reply. Here are the
known articles still in existence which covered the public exchange, though:
Space.com,
& SpaceViews.com.
Here's a
link to President
Bush's interesting new space exploration initiative website...
|
Regarding former President George H. Bush´s expression of desire back in 1989 that we send humans to Mars by 2019, the middle segment of the video available halfway down at this article displays it. NASA responded by quoting him a $450 billion dollar price (supposedly for a comprehensive plan that also involved permanent colonization of both the Moon and Mars, though). Regardless, however, as Dr. Robert Zubrin subsequently published, that price was nevertheless at least a few times higher than it needed to be (and it was laden with pork barrel spending). NASA now agrees that the Battlestar Galactica approach of sending along the fuel with which to return from Mars was excessive and over-priced.
![]() |
Meanwhile, to learn more about
China´s recent advances in space, and its
aspirations regarding the Moon and Mars, please visit
here.
| According to
EuroConsult-Ec.com, China's annual
military and civilian space budgets (combined) totaled merely $100 million in 1998. NASA's was $13.5 billion, and larger than those of the rest of the world's civilian space agencies combined. Why doesn't NASA get more bang for taxpayers' bucks? |
Why should we care about colonizing space? First,
we could probably repay our record high
$8 trillion dollar
national debt with the spin-off benefits resulting from colonization
efforts on the Moon and Mars (for instance). Such breakthroughs
would pertain to energy production, the biotech sector, robotics, mining,
chemistry, and telemedicine, to name a few. Additionally, students
would more eagerly embrace math & science like they did during
the 1960´s when eventual inventors like Bill Gates & Steve
Jobs initially fell in love with such subjects due to inspiration
derived from space exploration. Also, once we´re finally out
there, we could even learn to view others as fellow Earthlings, not
enemies.
Nevertheless, "baby boomers" will retire in droves by
2010 so, financially speaking, we do not have much time left to
fix the stagnating status
quo... Is NASA doing its job regarding Mars, or is it
repeatedly letting us down
regarding our neighboring planet?
.